轻便省电，20 小时续航 - LG Gram Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测羽量级冠军 作为一款搭载强劲酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器的 "长跑者"，LG Gram Pro 16 是旅行中的强力伴侣。不过，这款笔记本电脑在家庭娱乐中的出色音质和画面同样令人印象深刻。Marc Herter, 👁 Marc Herter (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/04/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 Laptop / Notebook Arc Lunar Lake Intel Windows
判决LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 完美融入了 LG Gram 系列的传统，体现了该品牌的核心价值：轻巧、高品质的外壳和出色的电池续航能力。LG 又一次成功地开发出了一款集便携性和生产力于一身的笔记本电脑。
制造商选择了功能强大的集成图形解决方案（iGPU）而不是专用显卡，乍看之下似乎不太寻常，但实际效果却很好。这款笔记本电脑的英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 图形处理器可为日常任务甚至一些要求更高的应用提供出色的性能。它的哑光 IPS 屏幕一改上一代产品的反射式 OLED 显示屏，具有极佳的户外可读性。
Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
与大多数 LG Gram 笔记本电脑一样，LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 主打移动性。这意味着与同类产品相比，它的计算能力可能略低。该笔记本电脑的基准测试结果证实了这一点。
尽管如此，LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 仍是一款出色的笔记本电脑，适合那些需要轻便、便携、电池续航时间长的用户。高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器、77 Wh 的大容量电池和轻巧的机身使这款笔记本电脑成为外出旅行的理想伴侣。
Pros+ 极其轻巧便携的设计
+ 高品质 IPS 显示屏
+ Wi-Fi 7 和雷电 4
+ 超长运行时间Cons- 在极端负荷下会出现轻微的热节流
- 外壳略有弯曲
- 英特尔 Arc 140V 无法完全赶上前代 RTX 3050
价格和供应情况目前，配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 处理器的新款 LG Gram Pro 16 在 LG 在线商店有售，降价后的价格为 2,099.99 美元。.
$1,169.00LG gram 16Z90P Laptop 16" IPS Ultra-Lightweight, (2560 x 1600), Intel Evo 11th gen Core i7, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Windows 11 Upgradeable, Alexa Built-in, 2X USB-C, HDMI, USB-A - Black$2,299.99LG gram Pro 2in1 16-inch Lightweight Touchscreen Laptop Computer, Intel Evo Edition Powered by Intel Core Ultra7 255H Processor, Windows 11 Home, 32GB RAM, 2TB SSD - Obsidian Black$2,289.99LG gram Pro 16-inch Lightweight Laptop Computer, Intel Evo Edition Powered by Intel Core Ultra7 255H Processor, Windows 11 Home, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD - Metal Blue
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Table of Contents判决规格外壳和连接输入设备显示屏性能排放与能源Notebookcheck 总评分Possible alternatives compared
LG 的 Gram Pro 16 是一款专为专业用户和要求苛刻的日常用户设计的设备。它将高分辨率 144 Hz 显示屏、Lunar Lake 处理器、快速固态硬盘和广泛的连接功能结合在一个轻巧的机身内，应该能为用户带来非凡的使用体验。我们上一次测试的是 配备 RTX 3050 的 Gram Pro.在这种情况下，英特尔的 Arc Graphics 140V 将不得不使用。
规格
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G (gram Pro 16 Series)ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 7 256V 8 x 2.2 - 4.8 GHz, Lunar LakeGraphics adapterIntel Arc Graphics 140VMemory16 GB Display16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, LG DISPLAY LP160WQ2-SPF1, IPS, glossy: no, 144 HzMainboardIntel Lunar Lake-MXStorageSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, 1024 GB , 840 GB freeSoundcardIntel Lunar Lake SOC - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)Connections2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm HeadsetNetworkingIntel BE201 320MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 13 x 357 x 250Battery77 Wh Lithium-IonOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: FullHD Windows HelloPrimary Camera: 2.1 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months WarrantyWeight1.229 kg, Power Supply: 154 g
Price2050 EuroLinksLG homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接LG 的笔记本电脑设计通常不会有太大变化。现在的 LG Gram Pro 与前代产品的区别在于 前代在一个关键细节上。LG 不再使用哑光漆面屏幕盖，而是在拉丝镁合金上使用薄层漆面，外观焕然一新。设备上的 USB-C 端口和 Wi-Fi 模块也进行了更新。
尺寸比较
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G HP Envy 16 h0112nr Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G DIN A4 ❌
HDMI、2 x USB4/Thunderbolt 4
2 x USB-A 3.1；3.5 毫米耳机
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel BE201 320MHz
1978 (1901min - 2024max) MBit/s Average of class Multimedia (606 - 1978, n=64, last 2 years)
1368 MBit/s -31%Average Intel BE201 320MHz (582 - 1978, n=41)
1327 MBit/s -33%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
947 (839min - 986max) MBit/s -52%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRealtek RTL8852BE
834 (802min - 867max) MBit/s -58%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
823 (328min - 1046max) MBit/s -58%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMediaTek RZ616
792 (447min - 946max) MBit/s -60% iperf3 receive AXE11000Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMediaTek RZ616
1747 (1710min - 1762max) MBit/s +2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel BE201 320MHz
1721 (1393min - 1831max) MBit/s Average of class Multimedia (682 - 1789, n=64, last 2 years)
1433 MBit/s -17%Average Intel BE201 320MHz (682 - 1755, n=41)
1409 MBit/s -18%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRealtek RTL8852BE
924 (883min - 942max) MBit/s -46%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
917 (806min - 986max) MBit/s -47%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
901 (728min - 937max) MBit/s -48% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzLG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel BE201 320MHz
2340 (2334min - 2347max) MBit/s LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1519 (1198min - 1919max) MBit/s -35%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1480 (828min - 1722max) MBit/s -37%Average of class Multimedia (705 - 2340, n=25, last 2 years)
1411 MBit/s -40%Average Intel BE201 320MHz (854 - 2340, n=27)
1352 MBit/s -42%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1351 (1012min - 1487max) MBit/s -42% iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzLG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel BE201 320MHz
2087 (1827min - 2337max) MBit/s LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1597min - 1698max) MBit/s -21%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1645 (1290min - 1772max) MBit/s -21%Average Intel BE201 320MHz (1205 - 2270, n=27)
1578 MBit/s -24%Average of class Multimedia (700 - 2087, n=25, last 2 years)
1508 MBit/s -28%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1264 (1021min - 1320max) MBit/s -39%
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2340 (2334-2347) HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1351 (1012-1487) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (828-1722) LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1198-1919) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2087 (1827-2337) HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1263 (1021-1320) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1597-1698) LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1644 (1290-1772) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1978 (1901-2024) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (802-867) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (328-1046) Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø777 (447-946) LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø947 (839-986) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1719 (1393-1831) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (883-942) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø900 (728-937) Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1747 (1710-1762) LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (806-986)
10.4 ∆E13.9 ∆E17.8 ∆E15.1 ∆E15.8 ∆E15 ∆E12.7 ∆E23.7 ∆E14.3 ∆E10.5 ∆E14.9 ∆E10.9 ∆E21.2 ∆E20.6 ∆E20.7 ∆E14.5 ∆E16.8 ∆E19.8 ∆E2.3 ∆E11.8 ∆E21.2 ∆E17.6 ∆E13 ∆E5.4 ∆EColorChecker LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G: 14.99 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 23.65 ∆E
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G
可持续性LG 包装的 Gram Pro 完全不含塑料。该设备还没有 PCF 文件。不过，这款笔记本电脑可以使用标准的家用工具进行拆卸。脚下有四颗十字螺丝，底板可以用塑料卡轻松拆卸。电池和固态硬盘也很容易更换。机身上还有第二个 NVMe 插槽。
输入设备尽管 LG Gram Pro 16 的设计很薄，但它的键盘输入手感很好，具有良好的触感和稳定性。背光灯让你在黑暗环境中也能打字。宽大的触摸板（13 × 8 厘米）可实现精确导航，其手掌识别功能也非常好用。
显示屏亚像素矩阵 LG Gram Pro虽然前代机型仍然采用 OLED 面板，但 LG 在当前的设备中再次选择了 IPS 屏幕。它具有出色的对比度、亮度和色彩还原值，但响应时间并不是最好的。另一方面，它没有出现 OLED 显示屏常见的闪烁现象。
407cd/m²420cd/m²403cd/m²399cd/m²442cd/m²396cd/m²379cd/m²422cd/m²385cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessLG DISPLAY LP160WQ2-SPF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 442 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 405.9 cd/m² Minimum: 27.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 86 %Center on Battery: 442 cd/m²Contrast: 2600:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.84 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}calibrated: 0.88ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.53 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}86.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)97.96% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.173CCT: 6496 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GLG DISPLAY LP160WQ2-SPF1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 HzAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KB160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 HzHP Envy 16 h0112nrSamsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 HzLG gram Pro 16Z90SPATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 HzAcer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVSamsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 HzLG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GLG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 60 HzDisplay-54%1%4%5%-1% Display P3 Coverage (%)97.9636.8 -62%99.3 1%99.8 2%99.9 2%96.3 -2% sRGB Coverage (%)10055.3 -45%100 0%100 0%100 0%99.7 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)86.6538 -56%88 2%94.6 9%98 13%85.1 -2%Response Times26%95%70%99%32% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)47 ?(21.5, 25.5)36 ?(17.4, 18.6) 23%2 ?(1, 1) 96%6 ?(3.5, 2.5) 87%0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2) 99%25 ?(12.5, 12.5) 47% Response Time Black / White * (ms)30 ?(16.5, 13.5)21.4 ?(12.8, 8.6) 29%1.9 ?(0.8, 1.1) 94%14 ?(10.5, 3.5) 53%0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3) 98%25 ?(12.5, 12.5) 17% PWM Frequency (Hz)240.4 ?(100)481120 ?(100) PWM Amplitude * (%)41Screen-280%-62%237%1680%-163%Brightness middle (cd/m²)442326 -26%328.8 -26%420 -5%407 -8%420 -5%Brightness (cd/m²)406303 -25%332 -18%421 4%405 0%387 -5%Brightness Distribution (%)8689 3%97 13%99 15%98 14%88 2%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.170.24 -41%0.006 96%0.001 99%0.34 -100%Contrast (:1)26001358 -48%70000 2592%407000 15554%1235 -52%Colorchecker dE 2000 *0.846.48 -671%1.53 -82%1.66 -98%2.27 -170%4.32 -414%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *1.6219.42 -1099%6.04 -273%4.92 -204%4.46 -175%8.55 -428%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *0.884.92 -459%3.39 -285%2.17 -147%1.27 -44%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.533.85 -152%1.3 15%1.3 15%2.3 -50%8.04 -425%Gamma2.173 101%2.79 79%2.18 101%2.27 97%2.231 99%2.224 99%CCT6496 100%6739 96%6362 102%6609 98%6443 101%8114 80%Total Average (Program / Settings)-103% /
-188%11% /
-16%104% /
163%595% /
1095%-44% /
-101%* ... smaller is better
我的克屏幕控制LG Gram Pro 采用 D75 白点，更符合北半球的日光。电脑屏幕通常更适应 D65 白点。因此，在测量时，我们将 My-gram 应用程序中的色温设置为典型的白点。结果，笔记本电脑的色彩表现非常出色，ΔΕ2000 < 1。
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.5 ms rise↘ 13.5 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.5 ms rise↘ 25.5 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8228 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Gram Pro 显示屏表面采用哑光处理，亮度高，视角稳定性好，适合户外使用。
性能LG 的新款 Gram Pro 设备完全采用了 Lunar Lake 技术。在这种情况下，你可以选择 Core Ultra 7 和 Core Ultra 9。我们的测试设备配备的是 Ultra 7 256V。
测试条件我们使用 "高 "功率模式对 LG Gram 进行了所有性能测试。在这种情况下，256V 的功率分别为 30 瓦（PL1）和 40 瓦（PL2）。
处理器随着 Lunar Lake 的推出，英特尔多年来首次告别了多线程。这意味着配备 4 个 P 核和 4 个 E 核的酷睿至尊 7 256V 总共有 8 个线程。与其说 Lunar Lake 特别强大，不如说它更节能。不过，Gram Pro 的性能还是可圈可点的。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel Core Ultra 7 256V: Ø1518 (1499.42-1627.14) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2019 (1940.52-2419.4) HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2325 (2293.84-2590.34) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Max Cooling: Ø1797 (1605.27-2243.28) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1568 (1267.75-1932.27) Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U: Ø1650 (1640.55-1663.48) LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1375 (1298.66-2049.39)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia
80.7 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
80.3 pt HP Envy 16 h0112nr -2! Intel Core i7-12700H
75.8 pt LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
68.8 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
68 pt Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
65.7 pt LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
64.5 pt LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
64.1 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30783, n=83, last 2 years)
15682 Points +49%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
14383 Points +37%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
13094 (11750.2min - 13094.1max) Points +24%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
12708 Points +21%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
11279 Points +7%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
9977 Points -5%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
10530 Points LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
8589 Points -18%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
10433 Points -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (8589 - 10768, n=7)
10065 Points -4%Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
1953 Points +3%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
1901 Points LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
1880 Points -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (1799 - 1902, n=7)
1859 Points -2%Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2290, n=75, last 2 years)
1831 Points -4%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
1772 Points -7%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
1651 Points -13%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1600 Points -16%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1496 Points -21%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1569 Points -17%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=66, last 2 years)
5822 Points +42%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
5483 Points +34%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
5053 Points +23%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
4947 Points +20%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
4290 Points +4%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
4106 Points Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
4096 Points 0%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (3822 - 4162, n=6)
4006 Points -2%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
761 Points +4%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
730 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (700 - 730, n=6)
717 Points -2%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
683 Points -6%Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=66, last 2 years)
675 Points -8%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
644 Points -12%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
620 Points -15%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
611 Points -16%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
2590 (2293.84min - 2590.34max) Points +59%Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=74, last 2 years)
2468 Points +52%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
2419 (1940.52min - 2419.4max) Points +49%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2243 (1605.27min - 2243.28max) Points +38%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1932 (1267.75min - 1932.27max) Points +19%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2049 (1298.66min - 2049.39max) Points +26%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
1663 (1640.55min - 1663.48max) Points +2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
1627 (1499.42min - 1627.14max) Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (1500 - 1627, n=5)
1567 Points -4%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
294 Points +3%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
286 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (275 - 290, n=5)
282 Points -1%Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=69, last 2 years)
265 Points -7%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
256 Points -10%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
256 Points -10%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
230 Points -20%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
210 Points -27%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
99.6 Points -65%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (324 - 373, n=6)
345 Seconds * -5%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
340 Seconds * -3%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
329 Seconds * Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
301 Seconds * +9%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
291 Seconds * +12%Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=68, last 2 years)
260 Seconds * +21%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
249 Seconds * +24%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
246 Seconds * +25%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=61, last 2 years)
58796 MIPS +65%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
54715 MIPS +54%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
49667 MIPS +40%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
48124 MIPS +35%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
47187 MIPS +33%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
43429 MIPS +22%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
35535 MIPS Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (33926 - 36072, n=6)
35427 MIPS 0%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
6162 MIPS +7%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
6018 MIPS +5%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
5749 MIPS Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=61, last 2 years)
5733 MIPS 0%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
5706 MIPS -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (5528 - 5749, n=6)
5650 MIPS -2%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
5196 MIPS -10%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
5159 MIPS -10%Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=79, last 2 years)
13559 Points +23%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
11646 Points +6%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
11496 Points +4%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
11026 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (9852 - 11085, n=7)
10801 Points -2%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
10774 Points -2%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
9903 Points -10%Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
2836 Points +3%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
2748 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (2680 - 2784, n=7)
2746 Points 0%Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=75, last 2 years)
2712 Points -1%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
2464 Points -10%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2320 Points -16%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2132 Points -22%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
12640 Points +35%Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 23059, n=66, last 2 years)
12176 Points +30%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
10747 Points +15%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
10277 Points +10%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
9997 Points +7%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (9302 - 9715, n=6)
9537 Points +2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
9361 Points Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
8507 Points -9%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
2000 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (1972 - 2013, n=6)
1997 Points 0%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
1955 Points -2%Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2555, n=66, last 2 years)
1878 Points -6%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
1822 Points -9%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
1773 Points -11%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1689 Points -16%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1462 Points -27%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
19.4 fps +49%Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=61, last 2 years)
17 fps +31%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
14.9 fps +15%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.2 fps +9%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
13 fps Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (11.9 - 13.5, n=6)
12.8 fps -2%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
11.9 fps -8%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
9.93 fps -24%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
66.4 s * -37%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
55.9 s * -15%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
55.6 s * -15%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.1 s * -14%Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=62, last 2 years)
50.4 s * -4%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (42.7 - 55.6, n=6)
49.4 s * -2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
48.4 s * HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
45.3 s * +6%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.526 sec * -14%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.516 sec * -12%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
0.4847 sec * -5%Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=61, last 2 years)
0.4803 sec * -4%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
0.4604 sec * HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H
0.4586 sec * -0%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (0.439 - 0.4645, n=6)
0.4548 sec * +1%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
0.4098 sec * +11%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1627 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit167.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit286 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)4106 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)730 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core8589 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core1901 Points
Help... in comparisonCinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparisonLenovo B50-30 (min)
N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)49 ...MSI Prestige 13 AI Plus Evo A2VMG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V1625Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs1626Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 R5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU1626LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G
Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V1627Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G5 21ML005JGE Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core1633Dell Latitude 13 7350 Ultra 5 135U, Graphics 4-Core1634MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q1635 ...
(max)
TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation15842
Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
86.9 pt Average of class Multimedia
81.6 pt Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
73.5 pt HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.8 pt LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
66.1 pt LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
60.1 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
58.5 pt LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
53.7 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
22795 KRay/s +80%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
16568 KRay/s +31%Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=59, last 2 years)
16415 KRay/s +30%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
12636 KRay/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (10524 - 12812, n=6)
12084 KRay/s -4%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11996 KRay/s -5%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
8160 KRay/s -35%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
7376 KRay/s -42%AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
87919 Points +43%Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=60, last 2 years)
77349 Points +26%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
68542 Points +11%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
67895 Points +10%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
61614 Points HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
60379 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (52443 - 61614, n=6)
58230 Points -5%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
44195 Points -28%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
3764 MB/s +43%Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=60, last 2 years)
3604 MB/s +37%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
3212 MB/s +22%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
3113 MB/s +18%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2847 MB/s +8%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
2632 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (2364 - 2814, n=6)
2624 MB/s 0%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
2035 MB/s -23%AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
101825 Points +105%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
84273 Points +69%Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=60, last 2 years)
82970 Points +67%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
81998 Points +65%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
73281 Points +47%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
67317 Points +35%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
49769 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (49622 - 49794, n=6)
49721 Points 0%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
12671 Points +186%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
10204 Points +130%Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=60, last 2 years)
9801 Points +121%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8137 Points +84%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
7036 Points +59%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
6136 Points +38%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
4431 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (4401 - 4431, n=6)
4423 Points 0%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
46152 Points +41%Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=59, last 2 years)
38726 Points +19%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
37000 Points +13%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
32644 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (27382 - 32644, n=6)
30792 Points -6%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29979 Points -8%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
21052 Points -36%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
18236 Points -44%AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
106504 MB/s +176%Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=60, last 2 years)
72335 MB/s +87%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
70521 MB/s +83%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
58016 MB/s +50%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
56673 MB/s +47%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
46246 MB/s +20%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (38495 - 40828, n=6)
39604 MB/s +2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
38641 MB/s AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
1043 MB/s +73%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1038 MB/s +72%Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=60, last 2 years)
961 MB/s +59%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
807 MB/s +34%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
689 MB/s +14%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
617 MB/s +2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
603 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (536 - 632, n=6)
591 MB/s -2%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
12177 KRay/s +77%Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=60, last 2 years)
8966 KRay/s +30%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
8558 KRay/s +24%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
6878 KRay/s HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6418 KRay/s -7%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (5655 - 6878, n=6)
6381 KRay/s -7%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
4262 KRay/s -38%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
3597 KRay/s -48%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
52131 MPixel/s LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
51992 MPixel/s 0%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (49906 - 52282, n=6)
51671 MPixel/s -1%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
44734 MPixel/s -14%Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 65787, n=60, last 2 years)
43591 MPixel/s -16%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
37404 MPixel/s -28%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
36794 MPixel/s -29%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
25283 MPixel/s -52%
系统性能有了 Lunar Lake，主内存安装得特别靠近处理器。这意味着指令和数据可以快速加载。这也对系统性能产生了积极影响。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score
HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7595 Points +13%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
6982 Points +4%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6677 - 7367, n=6)
6936 Points +3%Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=57, last 2 years)
6863 Points +2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
6711 Points Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
6456 Points -4%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5480 Points -18%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
5159 Points -23%PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
12144 Points +24%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
10801 Points +10%Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=57, last 2 years)
10475 Points +7%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9627 - 11365, n=6)
10234 Points +4%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
10184 Points +4%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
9799 Points LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
9557 Points -2%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8482 Points -13%PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
9674 Points +10%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
9355 Points +6%HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9224 Points +4%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8161 - 9544, n=6)
9031 Points +2%Average of class Multimedia (6763 - 10615, n=57, last 2 years)
8983 Points +2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
8832 Points LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
7822 Points -11%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7348 Points -17%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10617 Points +12%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9481 - 10126, n=6)
9810 Points +3%Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 15187, n=57, last 2 years)
9491 Points 0%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
9481 Points Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
8842 Points -7%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
7665 Points -19%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7166 Points -24%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
4985 Points -47%CrossMark / Overall
HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1826 Points +12%Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=67, last 2 years)
1747 Points +7%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1696 Points +4%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1636 - 1736, n=6)
1685 Points +3%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1636 Points LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1509 Points -8%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1469 Points -10%CrossMark / Productivity
HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1728 Points +11%Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=67, last 2 years)
1652 Points +6%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1624 Points +4%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1563 - 1682, n=6)
1622 Points +4%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1563 Points LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1443 Points -8%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1378 Points -12%CrossMark / Creativity
HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2016 Points +7%Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=67, last 2 years)
1980 Points +5%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1862 - 1962, n=6)
1917 Points +1%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1891 Points Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1887 Points 0%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1739 Points -8%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1679 Points -11%CrossMark / Responsiveness
HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1599 Points +32%Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=67, last 2 years)
1433 Points +18%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
1401 Points +15%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1215 - 1343, n=6)
1280 Points +5%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1215 Points LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1190 Points -2%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1129 Points -7%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=69, last 2 years)
327 Points +35%HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
300 Points +23%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
295 Points +21%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (243 - 310, n=6)
295 Points +21%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
272 Points +12%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
272 Points +12%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
271 Points +12%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
243 Points LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213 Points -12%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (282 - 286, n=6)
284 Points +1%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
281.6 Points Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 353, n=63, last 2 years)
274 Points -3%HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 Points -6%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
249 Points -12%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
246 Points -13%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
235 Points -17%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
642 ms * -34%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
565 ms * -18%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
551 ms * -15%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
551 ms * -15%HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
535 ms * -11%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
480 ms * Average of class Multimedia (254 - 835, n=73, last 2 years)
478 ms * -0%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (470 - 480, n=6)
473 ms * +1%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
436 ms * +9%* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score
6711 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
101522 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (99227 - 104459, n=6)
101498 MB/s 0%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
91070 MB/s -10%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
90319 MB/s -11%Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 108302, n=60, last 2 years)
76015 MB/s -25%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
67029 MB/s -34%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56883 MB/s -44%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
38001 MB/s -63%AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (86352 - 89144, n=6)
87867 MB/s +2%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
87543 MB/s +1%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
86352 MB/s LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
78395 MB/s -9%Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=60, last 2 years)
76945 MB/s -11%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66192 MB/s -23%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
50187 MB/s -42%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
44209 MB/s -49%AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (108692 - 117933, n=6)
115431 MB/s +6%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
108692 MB/s Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
93080 MB/s -14%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
75978 MB/s -30%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
75906 MB/s -30%Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=60, last 2 years)
75278 MB/s -31%HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
58969 MB/s -46%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
42604 MB/s -61%AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
233 ns * -142%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
149.2 ns * -55%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, Radeon 760M
120.1 ns * -25%Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=60, last 2 years)
114.2 ns * -19%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (96.1 - 99.6, n=6)
98.8 ns * -3%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
96.1 ns * HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.7 ns * +5%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M
87.7 ns * +9%* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟监控
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
12975.7 μs * LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
9965.5 μs * LG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2447.2 μs * Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
958.8 μs * HP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
889.1 μs * * ... smaller is better
存储设备LG Gram Pro 16 配备了快速的 1-TB SSD（三星 PM9A1a）。它能确保快速的访问时间和数据传输速率，而不会出现热节流现象。
DiskSpdSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLUDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
6837MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
4954MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3202MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
2298MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
635MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
396MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
57.7MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
106.2MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
6745MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
89.5 pt Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
85.1 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
77.7 pt HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
73.7 pt Average of class Multimedia
72.6 pt LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
63.6 pt LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
62.8 pt LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
45.5 pt DiskSpd
seq readAcer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
3828 (3608.27min - 3827.51max) MB/s +20%Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU (3028 - 4104, n=8)
3465 MB/s +8%HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3337 (3241.38min - 3336.82max) MB/s +4%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3202 (3172.94min - 3202.45max) MB/s Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
3176 (3116.01min - 3176.35max) MB/s -1%Average of class Multimedia (453 - 4553, n=62, last 2 years)
2881 MB/s -10%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2749 (2718.97min - 2748.53max) MB/s -14%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2497 (2440.93min - 2496.87max) MB/s -22% seq writeAcer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
3838 (3706.3min - 3838.08max) MB/s +67%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
3741 (3544.61min - 3741.18max) MB/s +63%HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3337 (3241.38min - 3337.44max) MB/s +45%Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU (2298 - 4533, n=8)
3304 MB/s +44%Average of class Multimedia (384 - 5711, n=62, last 2 years)
3116 MB/s +36%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2722 (2647.18min - 2721.68max) MB/s +18%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2298 (2138.8min - 2297.66max) MB/s LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
1892 (1736.74min - 1891.63max) MB/s -18% seq q8 t1 readAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
6993 (6509.35min - 6992.53max) MB/s +2%Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU (6023 - 7058, n=8)
6867 MB/s 0%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
6837 (4982.31min - 6836.67max) MB/s Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
6765 (5389.81min - 6764.68max) MB/s -1%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6621 (6016.94min - 6621.13max) MB/s -3%HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6593 (5975.42min - 6593.24max) MB/s -4%Average of class Multimedia (467 - 7126, n=62, last 2 years)
5274 MB/s -23%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
3622 (2815.85min - 3622.32max) MB/s -47% seq q8 t1 writeAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
6047 (5993.87min - 6046.58max) MB/s +22%Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU (4913 - 5265, n=8)
4999 MB/s +1%HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4991 (4646.87min - 4990.59max) MB/s +1%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4961 (4947.18min - 4960.81max) MB/s 0%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4954 (4906.33min - 4954.05max) MB/s Average of class Multimedia (247 - 6898, n=62, last 2 years)
4091 MB/s -17%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
3893 (3812.34min - 3893.13max) MB/s -21%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
2408 (1801.28min - 2407.74max) MB/s -51% 4k q1 t1 readAverage Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU (57.3 - 95.2, n=8)
70.4 MB/s +22%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
63.6 (60.85min - 63.63max) MB/s +10%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
62.1 (61.13min - 62.11max) MB/s +8%Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=62, last 2 years)
60.5 MB/s +5%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
59.3 (57.02min - 59.34max) MB/s +3%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
57.7 (56.45min - 57.71max) MB/s LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
54.1 (52.53min - 54.09max) MB/s -6%HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
49 (47.57min - 48.98max) MB/s -15% 4k q1 t1 writeAcer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
214 (212.23min - 213.77max) MB/s +102%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
168.1 (149.2min - 168.09max) MB/s +58%Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU (106.2 - 270, n=8)
162 MB/s +53%Average of class Multimedia (40.3 - 378, n=62, last 2 years)
159.9 MB/s +51%HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
143.6 (143.02min - 143.57max) MB/s +35%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
106.2 (102.9min - 106.24max) MB/s LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
101.1 (92.92min - 101.07max) MB/s -5%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
80.9 (71.76min - 80.92max) MB/s -24% 4k q32 t16 readAverage Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU (635 - 3896, n=8)
1625 MB/s +156%Average of class Multimedia (190.3 - 4881, n=62, last 2 years)
1348 MB/s +112%HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1310 (1228.8min - 1310.37max) MB/s +106%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1047 (1042.78min - 1046.81max) MB/s +65%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
948 (918.78min - 947.91max) MB/s +49%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
744 (687.95min - 744max) MB/s +17%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
635 (597.42min - 634.57max) MB/s LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
460 (375.72min - 459.87max) MB/s -28% 4k q32 t16 writeAcer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVMicron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
2604 (2601.31min - 2604.42max) MB/s +558%Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU (349 - 3717, n=8)
1230 MB/s +211%Average of class Multimedia (154.9 - 3628, n=62, last 2 years)
980 MB/s +147%HP Envy 16 h0112nrMicron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
546 (534.95min - 545.61max) MB/s +38%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KMicron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
415 (366.84min - 415.07max) MB/s +5%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
396 (253.45min - 395.79max) MB/s LG gram Pro 16Z90SPSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
343 (332.92min - 343.02max) MB/s -13%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GSamsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
192.1 (173.02min - 192.12max) MB/s -51%
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6745 (5921.42-6776.53) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6360 (2361.91-6999.04) HP Envy 16 h0112nr Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø6437 (4756.27-6626.16) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6074 (3285.54-6606.66) Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4953 (1690.07-6771.37) LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3024 (2607.57-3618.53)
图形卡LG Gram Pro 16 的集成英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 显卡在通用基准测试中的性能与前代机型的 RTX 3050 相当，但在实际应用中通常仍低于前代机型。在直接对比中，英特尔显卡潜在的更大内存在某些应用中被证明是一个优势。OpenVINO 提供的硬件加速和广泛的人工智能支持使整体表现更加完美。
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
HP Envy 16 h0112nrNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
100 pt Average of class Multimedia
65.1 pt LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
56.6 pt Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
56.1 pt LG gram Pro 16Z90SPNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.1 pt LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
38.4 pt Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Radeon 760M, AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
37.6 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
25.2 pt 3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsHP Envy 16 h0112nrNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
81209 Points +46%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
55747 Points LG gram Pro 16Z90SPNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
54442 Points -2%Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (38542 - 61591, n=16)
53544 Points -4%Average of class Multimedia (16765 - 130614, n=28, last 2 years)
48929 Points -12%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Radeon 760M, AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
39213 Points -30%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35698 Points -36%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
24614 Points -56%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsHP Envy 16 h0112nrNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
18797 Points +97%Average of class Multimedia (2328 - 34440, n=63, last 2 years)
13093 Points +37%Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6790 - 10476, n=33)
9583 Points 0%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
9565 Points LG gram Pro 16Z90SPNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9216 Points -4%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7187 Points -25%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Radeon 760M, AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
6559 Points -31%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
4449 Points -53%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsHP Envy 16 h0112nrNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
7708 Points +99%Average of class Multimedia (696 - 13010, n=64, last 2 years)
5033 Points +30%Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (2955 - 4415, n=36)
3955 Points +2%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
3874 Points LG gram Pro 16Z90SPNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3786 Points -2%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2550 Points -34%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Radeon 760M, AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
2293 Points -41%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Radeon 860M, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
1656 Points -57%
3DMark 11 Performance
11451 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
33323 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
8704 points3DMark Time Spy Score
4133 points3DMark Steel Nomad Score
724 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3103 pointsHelp... in comparison3DMark 11 in comparisonHP Stream 7 5700ng (min)
Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)183 ...Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M11387Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN i7-1260P, A350M11409Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M11413LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G
Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V11451GMK NucBox M7 Pro R9 PRO 6950H, Radeon 680M11491HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M11523Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M11531 ...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max)
R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 509082642
Blender
v3.3 Classroom CPUAverage Intel Arc Graphics 140V (506 - 772, n=33)
592 Seconds * -11%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
534 Seconds * Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=68, last 2 years)
426 Seconds * +20% v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/IntelLG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
401 Seconds * Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (195 - 405, n=20)
245 Seconds * +39%Average of class Multimedia (169 - 401, n=8, last 2 years)
236 Seconds * +41%* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
98.7 pt LG gram Pro 16Z90SP -1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
85.9 pt HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
62.6 pt LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
58.4 pt Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M
42.2 pt LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G -2! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
37 pt Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M
36.8 pt Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia (6.41 - 97.8, n=67, last 2 years)
35.1 fps +80%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
25.7 (15.9min) fps +32%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
21.5 (9.21min, 15.1P0.1, 17.5P1) fps +10%HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
23.4 (19.1min) fps +20%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
19.5 fps Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M
16.2 (14min) fps -17%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M
11.1 (9.07min) fps -43%Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (7.8 - 127.3, n=55, last 2 years)
45.3 fps +107%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
38.5 fps +76%HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
26 fps +19%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
21.9 (14.9min, 14.9P0.1, 15P1) fps Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M
16.3 (13.3min, 13.3P0.1, 14P1) fps -26%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M
14.3 fps -35%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=61, last 2 years)
48.8 fps +116%HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
25.8 (3.02min, 14.1P1) fps +14%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
22.6 (2.59min, 17.2P1) fps Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M
17.3 (2.01min, 12.3P1) fps -23%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M
13.5 (3.16min, 9.17P1) fps -40%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
9.59 (0.2412min, 0.903P1) fps -58%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 132, n=64, last 2 years)
46.5 fps +40%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
42 fps +27%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
33.1 fps HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
29.7 fps -10%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M
21.1 fps -36%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M
15.5 fps -53%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
14.7 fps -56%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 247, n=63, last 2 years)
82.1 fps +47%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
60 (43min, 46.4P1) fps +7%HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
57.7 (25.5min, 43.6P1) fps +3%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
55.9 (12.2min, 30.2P1) fps Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M
37.8 (7.6min, 9.52P1) fps -32%LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
27.1 (5min, 5P1) fps -52%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M
25.2 (14.9min, 16.9P1) fps -55%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
88.7 (74.7min) fps +48%Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=66, last 2 years)
86.2 fps +44%HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
70.1 (42.4min) fps +17%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
60 (32.2min) fps LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
43.7 (28.8min) fps -27%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M
39.8 (30.7min) fps -34%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M
39 (28.5min) fps -35%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
60.1 fps +94%Average of class Multimedia (16.9 - 141.1, n=61, last 2 years)
56.3 fps +82%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M
34.9 fps +13%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
30.9 fps LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.8 fps 0%HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
29.1 fps -6%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M
25.6 fps -17%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V: Ø19 (18-20) Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M: Ø10.5 (8.25-10.8) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø22.4 (20.3-24.2) LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø21.5 (20-22.5) Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M: Ø13 (10.5-15.8)
lowmed.highultraQHDGTA V (2015)
156.9
140.8
49.5
22.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
98.3
88.4
52
60
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
71.7
46
33.1
25.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
40.8
36.5
30.9
Strange Brigade (2018)
179.7
75.1
65
55.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
27.7
22.5
21.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)
41.4
22.1
19.5
F1 24 (2024)
47.3
排放与能源噪音排放LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 的散热系统由两个风扇组成，在正常办公使用时几乎不会启动，因此工作时几乎没有噪音。由于采用了各种风扇配置文件，即使在负载情况下，笔记本电脑也能保持安静。即使在最大负载情况下，风扇的噪音也能达到 43 dB(A)左右，可以承受。
Noise Level
Idle
25.2 / 25.2 / 27.7 dB(A)Load
/ 42.7 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.2 dB(A)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GArc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLUAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KRadeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGNHP Envy 16 h0112nrGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFHLG gram Pro 16Z90SPGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLRAcer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVRadeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GBLG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLBNoise7%-0%-5%-11%7%off / environment * (dB)25.223 9%22.8 10%25.2 -0%25 1%24.95 1%Idle Minimum * (dB)25.223 9%22.9 9%25.2 -0%26 -3%24.95 1%Idle Average * (dB)25.223 9%22.9 9%26.3 -4%29 -15%24.95 1%Idle Maximum * (dB)27.724.67 11%30.5 -10%26.7 4%39 -41%25.3 9%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)42.641.53 3%52 -22%43 -1%Load Maximum * (dB)42.742.51 -0%51.4 -20%45.1 -6%45 -5%32 25%Load Average * (dB)31.7241.431.84538.54Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)51.1* ... smaller is better
温度LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 在压力测试中表现出良好的温度管理能力。在满载的情况下，它的机箱并没有过度升温。只有在铰链处，也就是风扇散热的地方，我们测得温度有所升高。压力测试进行了大约 20 分钟后，我们发现了一些轻微的热节流现象。
Max. LoadIdle
38.1 °C39.2 °C40.5 °C 32.3 °C37.8 °C32.2 °C 26.5 °C25.1 °C26.9 °C
Maximum: 40.5 °CAverage: 33.2 °C
36.9 °C45 °C36.7 °C29.8 °C42 °C36.3 °C24.5 °C28.5 °C25.1 °C
Maximum: 45 °CAverage: 33.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), FIRT 550-Pocket Max. LoadIdle
26.3 °C27.1 °C26.4 °C 23.1 °C25.5 °C22.8 °C 23.1 °C23.7 °C22.8 °C
Maximum: 27.1 °CAverage: 24.5 °C
27.6 °C28.8 °C25.3 °C25.8 °C27.2 °C25.8 °C23.5 °C25.1 °C23.5 °C
Maximum: 28.8 °CAverage: 25.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 31 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), FIRT 550-Pocket(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.8 °C / 3.3 F).
闲置
闲置
压力测试
压力测试
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140VAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860MHP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPULG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPUAcer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760MLG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUHeat2%-12%-19%-16%-0%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)40.548 -19%45.2 -12%49 -21%48 -19%40.1 1%Maximum Bottom * (°C)4551 -13%44 2%48.5 -8%60 -33%42.9 5%Idle Upper Side * (°C)27.122 19%33.6 -24%33.5 -24%28 -3%26.8 1%Idle Bottom * (°C)28.823 20%32.6 -13%35 -22%31 -8%31.1 -8%* ... smaller is better
发言人LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 的立体声扬声器具有令人惊讶的强劲音效和良好的低音。不过，高音有时会有所减弱，但可以通过均衡器加以修正。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.2% lower than median(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量LG Gram Pro 16 的高能效 Lunar Lake 处理器通常能确保低功耗。即使在负载情况下，65 瓦的电源也不会被完全利用。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.108 / 0.509 WattIdle 4.15 / 5.4 / 12.4 Watt
Load
/ 60.049 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø56.7 (42.9-60.2) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.48 (4.43-11.9) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø48.2 (42.8-58) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Browsing: Ø6.82 (3.91-21)
Power consumption with external monitor
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø42.2 (38.5-60) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø22.2 (18.2-33.1) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø48.8 (43.8-58.7) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.7 (38.4-49.9) LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø48.1 (43.5-54.7)
运行时间LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS 配备了 77 Wh 的电池，专为长时间运行而设计。在我们的测试中，该设备的 Wi-Fi 上网时间达到了令人印象深刻的近 20 小时。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
19h 36min
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GCore Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 77 WhAsus Vivobook 16 M1606KRyzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 42 WhHP Envy 16 h0112nri7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 83 WhLG gram Pro 16Z90SPUltra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 WhAcer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVR5 8640U, Radeon 760M, 54 WhLG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 WhAverage of class Multimedia Battery Runtime-65%-60%-42%-76%-22%-41%WiFi v1.3 (h)19.66.8 -65%7.9 -60%11.4 -42%4.8 -76%15.3 -22%11.6 ?(4.37 - 20.1, n=68, last 2 years) -41%H.264 (h)6.815.9 ?(8.3 - 24.7, n=38, last 2 years)Load (h)1.11.62.31.71 ?(0.833 - 3.48, n=41, last 2 years)Reader / Idle (h)17.821.4 ?(10.2 - 46, n=9, last 2 years)
Notebookcheck 总评分LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G 是一款功能强大、移动性极强的笔记本电脑。凭借高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器、集成的英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 和快速的 1-TB SSD 存储，它可为要求苛刻的任务和日常使用提供稳定的性能。特别值得一提的是，它的电池续航时间长达近 20 小时，屏幕绚丽夺目，机身轻巧但坚固耐用。
Back to the verdict
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G
- 03/27/2025 v8
Marc Herter
Chassis85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard83%
Pointing Device87%
Connectivity68 / 80 → 86%
Weight72 / 20-74 → 97%
Battery92 / 95 → 97%
Display89%
Games Performance51 / 88 → 58%
Application Performance81 / 92 → 88%
AI Performance87%
Temperature92%
Noise83 / 95 → 87%
Audio76%
Camera39 / 75 → 52%
Average66%
84%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging100%Power Use89.3%Repairability50%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 43.6%
Possible alternatives compared
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay
1.83.9%LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89GIntel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,169.00LG gram 16Z90P Laptop 16" IP...2. $2,299.99LG gram Pro 2in1 16-inch Lig...3. $2,289.99LG gram Pro 16-inch Lightwei...List Price: 2050€1.2 kg13 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS
2.77.6%Asus Vivobook 16 M1606KAMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $6.952PCS Keyboard Cover for 16" ...2. $10.993 Pack Anti Glare Matte Scre...3. $505.00ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16�...1.9 kg19.9 mm16.00"1920x1200142 PPIIPS
3.86.9% v7 (old)HP Envy 16 h0112nrIntel Core i7-12700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $59.99Genuine 200W AC/DC Adapter C...2. $49.74FZ06XL Laptop Battery Replac...3. $9.392 Pack Screen Protector for ...List Price: 1700 USD2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"3840x2400189 PPIOLED
4.81.2%LG gram Pro 16Z90SPIntel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,867.88LG gram Pro 16-inch Thin and...2. $7.99Keyboard Cover for 16" LG Gr...3. $2,092.99LG gram Pro 16-inch Lightwei...List Price: 2000€1.3 kg14.4 mm16.00"2880x1800212 PPIOLED
5.81.3%Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XVAMD Ryzen 5 8640U ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDList Price: 1000 EUR1.2 kg13 mm16.00"3200x2000236 PPIOLED
6.87% v7 (old)LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79GIntel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,485.00LG Computer2. $47.99JIAZIJIA LBV7227E Laptop Bat...3. $65.50KGIGIBE Replacement Keyboard...1.3 kg18.1 mm17.00"2560x1600178 PPIIPS
More articles related to this deviceLG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G (gram Pro 16 Series)Review•配备 NvidiaGeForce 芯片的 LG Gram Pro 16 超轻笔记本电脑评测--大胆的极简主义 |Review•LG gram Pro 二合一 16T90SP 评测--轻巧、功能强大
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 460 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 624813 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!